What web stats package do you have? Do you trust it? My web hosting package comes with three pre-installed: Awstats, Webalizer and Analog. I was always pretty content to use Awstats as it produced comprehensive, easy-to-read statistics.
However, it wasn't until I happened to look at another of my web stats packages that I noticed some serious discrepancies between the three.
Take a look at these figures for October, 2004:
|Bandwidth||530.11 MB||710.67 MB||692.69 MB|
I'm pretty surprised by these differences, especially when all three packages are running on the same server. I can understand how things like visits and page views might be calculated slightly differently, but bandwidth?
Checking the HTTP bandwidth using the tool that my web host provides in control panel, I see that according to it, my bandwidth usage for October was 765.36 MB (of course, it would be the highest).
So, as they are higher, perhaps I should go off Webalizer stats rather than Awstats. But what if a potential advertiser who wants to put a link on my site asks me for my traffic stats? Which ones do I provide? Should conscience dictate that I provide an average of them, or the lowest, to be safe?
I wonder if anyone else has noticed anything similar?
Posted on: November 21, 2004 | 2 Comments