April 18, 2007
Update: I added three new image editors to the list — Online Photo Tool, Fauxto and Picnik. All of them are good; I am certainly impressed by the quality of the tools that are now available online.
Of the three, I would definitely recommend checking out Picnik, if only to appreciate the elegance of its interface.
A not uncommon request my web team receives is to do some sort of simple image editing for a staff member. I also sometimes hear that someone is getting Photoshop installed so that they can edit images and add them to their intranet site themselves.
This is crazy when you consider how much Photoshop costs and the learning curve to use it properly.
In this new era of web-based applications I thought it would be worthwhile to see if there were any online image editing tools that would meet these requirements and maybe more.
I looked at the following online image editors:
One service I didn't include was Preloadr because it only works with Flickr and uses the nexImage technology anyway.
View the comparison of features table.
As well as showing which tool did what, I tried to indicate — where it was useful — which tools were especially full-featured when it came to certain activities, such as applying a wide range of effects or being able to save an image to multiple formats.
Overall, I was very impressed with what's available when it comes to editing images online. By and large the tools were easy to use and had an impressive array of features.
The majority of the tools had solid basic image editing functionality — crop, resize, adjust color, brightness and so on. Some had unlimited levels of undo and redo, which was especially handy.
Some of the features available were up there with full-blown graphics tools. For example, Cellsea included the unsharp mask function for accurately adjusting sharpness.
Two of the image editors (NetImager and nexImage) allowed you to use layers to apply your changes and effects in a non-destructive way, which was a nice feature.
The tools were integrated to varying degress with online image storage services like Flickr and Photobucket. Some also enabled you to view all the images from a web page and then choose which one you wanted to edit, although apart from Cellsea, this was done via a bookmarklet.
The tools had varying capabilities when it came to uploading and saving images from/to different formats. However, between them all you could probably upload and save an image in most of the main file formats (e.g., JPG, GIF, PNG, BMP, TIFF, PDF, EPS).
I was particularly impressed with Cellsea and will likely settle on it as the tool I recommend to others. It has a clean, responsive interface with an impressive set of features and can handle a wide range of file formats.
Posted on: April 18, 2007 | 6 Comments